Long-form writing for compliance officers, CISOs, and engineers who need to understand the regulatory shape of AI agents in production.
The clearest plain-English breakdown of what high-risk AI systems must log under Article 12, what the AI Office has signalled as adequate, and how to operationalise it before August 2026.
Specialty brokers and Lloyd's syndicate underwriters increasingly require AI logging evidence at renewal. What the submissions actually ask for, and how to answer.
An engineer's-eye view: the structural reasons general-purpose observability and SIEM tooling don't capture the right shape of evidence for AI agent compliance.
Our blog is where the long-form thinking lives. We write for the people who actually have to make AI agent compliance work — CISOs preparing for the EU AI Act, compliance officers translating Article 12 into engineering tickets, and engineers shipping evidence packs to auditors. No gated PDFs and no email-walled webinars. Everything is published openly, indexed properly, and built to be cited.
Cadence is roughly weekly. We publish when we have something specific to say — a regulatory interpretation that's load-bearing in our discovery conversations, a piece of engineering nuance we keep explaining, or a comparison with another tool we've evaluated and want to be straight about. If you're researching for a procurement review, you'll find more substance here than in the marketing pages. If you're researching for an essay, every claim is sourced.
Subscribe via RSS at /blog/feed.xml (coming Q3 2026) or follow us on LinkedIn at /vantagepointnetworks. Pull-requests on factual errors welcome — the repository will be public when the SDK launches on PyPI.